Log in

Sep. 5th, 2007 (UTC)

...amending the argument I was rebutting....

He argued that the additional mental capacity that allows seemingly endless human innovation was such a departure from what had come before, and mostly favorable to people after they had had offspring such that it could not possibly be a successful or meaningful selection criterion.

Therefore it had to come from "somewhere else." (aka God.)

I'm pretty much the only agnostic / atheist in my family, so.... I just let that lay where it fell...

(I call myself agnostic for my family's sake, but the longer the go, the more atheist I feel.)

Comment Form

No HTML allowed in subject


Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting. 

(will be screened)