Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Some thoughts on human sexuality

  • Oct. 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 PM
full of sex
[Edit] The map has been updated since this post was made! The new, improved version is here.




Some time ago, a person named Katharine Gates designed a map of human sexuality. Her Web site appears to be defunct now, but the map has recently gained exposure in other places.

My first impression upon seeing this fetish map was that it was woefully incomplete. About the same time as I became aware of this attempt to map the range of human fetishes and sexual activity, I also saw a conversation on another forum in which a woman was complaining that she wanted to spice up her sex life, but she didn't want to do too much, because if she did too much too fast then by the time she was 30 she'd have done every sexual act there was to do, and where would she be able to find sexual ideas after that?

That particular conversation, and another with an 18-year-old who claimed to be "bored with sex" because he'd "done it all," got me to thinking about the range of the human sexual condition (vast beyond all reckoning) and the range of sexual things many people think there is (tiny).

I wanted to try my hand at designing a fetish map that would be a bit more complete than Ms. Gates', and I thought, why not do it as an actual map? One of the ideas I wanted to convey was how small most folks' sexual experience is, how small most folks' conception of the whole range of sexual expression is, and how vast the actual range of sexual expression is. And, I thought, a map of an imaginary world might be a way to do that.

So here it is, the first version of what I'm sure will be many revisions of the Land of Human Sexuality. (Clicky on this map to see a bigger version. A much, much, much, MUCH bigger version.)



The land of most folks' awareness is the Island of Mundania and the surrounding islands. Across the Straits of Fear is the portion of the continent that folks are generally aware of to some extent (gay sex, threesomes, light bondage, and so on). Beyond the Great Barrier Mountains and the Lesser Barrier Mountains, which demarcate the limits of common knowledge of different fetishes, lie the more exotic forms of sexual expression (natori, shibari, cosplay, fisting, puppy play, and so forth). In the frigid arctic wastes to the far north are those activities which only a very, very tiny percentage even of veteran, seasoned kinksters finds appealing (nullification, erotic cannibalism, necrophilia, and that sort of thing).

There's no particular meaning to the size or color of the various areas; it'd be an impossible task to try to, for example, figure out how many furries there are compared to how many folks are into TENS units. Likewise, some of the activities listed could reasonably belong to more than one classification, and some things (like "gay sex") are within the realm of knowledge of most folks but aren't really activities per se (most sexual activities not requiring physical possession of a penis or a vagina can be done by people of any sex or sexual orientation). Nevertheless, when folks think of "sexual things to do," gay sex does seem to be considered its own thing, even though it's not actually an activity by itself, so it's on the map--right across the Straits of Fear.

Anyway, I'd love to hear feedback and commentary on this map. I'v actually been working on it for quite a long time, and I suspect it's still a work in progress--I know there are things I've forgotten. (It's hard work trying to remember every form of fetish out there!)

Comments

( 123 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
[info]kiki39 wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:34 am (UTC)
ZOMG I love this... I especially like that it makes me think of Tolkien (in a kinky way). Can you include a picture of a ship sailing off somewhere to reaches heretofore as yet unknown?

*has wanderlust*
[info]chicky wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:39 am (UTC)
And a sea monster (perhaps swimming over by the Angry Dragon).
(no subject) - [info]madamruppy - Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:12 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]darkwolf69 - Oct. 14th, 2008 03:24 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 14th, 2008 03:31 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]chicky wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:38 am (UTC)
Christ, I'm all over the map!
[info]icedrake wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:53 am (UTC)
"gigolo" is misspelled.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:42 pm (UTC)
Thanks! Fixed now.
[info]georgiamagnolia wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:01 am (UTC)
So how exactly are you choosing what goes on the map? If anyone actually admits to doing a thing or just has talked about doing a thing or gotten off talking or thinking about a thing? I ask because having worked for an adult conversation line for the last nine years, I have heard some ... uh ... things. I hesitate to actually call them interesting things. As a result I recognize way too many of the things on this map. Oddly enough, furries and plushies don't seem to call our line. EVERYONE else does though. Happily that is no longer my day job, but I still have my hand in, so to speak. (gah! no pun intended)

(and as an aside, I love "literotica bay", that cracked me up. I've been swimming there... *snerk*)
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:43 pm (UTC)
Things generally go on the map if they're real fetishes engaged in, however infrequently, by real people. (The exception is the Land of Myth, which contains things like gerbilling and snuff films which are part of the popular folklore, but which have never actually been recorded for real.)
[info]madamruppy wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:08 am (UTC)
That is very interesting, I'm actually surprised at how few I hadn't heard of. I really thought there would be more. I guess I don't live as sheltered an existence as I though.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:44 pm (UTC)
Or we have similar tastes,a nd there's a lot of stuff out there neither of us has heard of (yet)...
(no subject) - [info]madamruppy - Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:57 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]timestheyare wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:17 am (UTC)
I like it muchly. I think it would be significantly more interesting to look at with some more landscape art, though.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:44 pm (UTC)
Yep! Future versions will likely have more embellishments, and more terrain as well. :)
[info]wherever wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:19 am (UTC)
This is amazing...I love it. I think it's a lot easier to read than Gates's map.

I'm a little confused; are the things above or below the Lesser Barrier mountains supposed to be more intense?

Also I believe it's spelled capsaicin, if you're talking about the active component of chili pepper.
[info]exodavinci wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 06:44 am (UTC)
I'm a little confused; are the things above or below the Lesser Barrier mountains supposed to be more intense?


I got the impression that the region *in between* the lesser and greater barrier mountains (i.e. the region directly across the channel from Mundania, including "Locations") is intended to be the "less intense" region, with things getting more intense as you cross either mountain range.

(no subject) - [info]wherever - Oct. 3rd, 2008 09:47 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:47 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wherever - Oct. 15th, 2008 02:11 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 15th, 2008 03:00 am (UTC) Expand
[info]sacredchao wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:29 am (UTC)
Coprophagia, not "corprophagia," I think.
[info]drjon wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:26 am (UTC)
Hee hee.

Yah, corprophagia is different.
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:48 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]juliana_shines wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:29 am (UTC)
This is great, easy to read and even some terms I'm going to have to research. Wonderful.
It does make me want to fold it up and stick it in my glove box for future reference. Or maybe stick it up over my desk and put push pins in the places I've been.
Note to self: get more push pins

Edited at 2008-10-03 03:29 am (UTC)
[info]writersblock_va wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 01:38 pm (UTC)
Heh! ^This I like! :D

Its an excellent map tho :D Tha
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:49 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]apestyle - Oct. 3rd, 2008 08:51 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]argonel - Oct. 3rd, 2008 11:56 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]2redpath5 wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:39 am (UTC)
Holy Crap, this is brilliant. I've never seen anything like it and can't imagine how you've done this. But we thank you.
I too was struck by the notion to print it out and spend time reviewing and researching.
I want to go everywhere.
I love the push pin idea!
Um, there were lots of suggestions made.
Are you actually open to those??
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:50 pm (UTC)
Icon love! :) And I'm always open to suggestions.
[info]redhotlips wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:47 am (UTC)
I wonder if this map might be used in couples councelling? His and her push pins. His and hers 'want to go to' flag pins.

Think too of the possibilities at kinky birthday parties! Pin the kink on the map!

Another thought: this isn't meant to be comprehensive, right? Where would dacryphilia fall, for instance? Under the 'Sploshing' or under the 'bodily fluids fetish' or the 'humiliation' or even 'activity fetish'?

Oh, and another thought... there may be an isthmus or a bridge or two between some islands, or even across the Straits (it amused me that it was Straits, and not Straights)

Edited at 2008-10-03 03:56 am (UTC)
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:52 pm (UTC)
It's intended to be as comprehensive as possible. Dacryphilia would probably be in its own section (and I need to add it); it's not necessarily a bodily fluid thing because (at least for me) it's not the tears themselves so much as the emotional response they signify. It's also not quite humiliation, but its close.

Hmm.

You know what's interesting is that now that I have the first version up, I'm already thinking of things I've forgotten, and some of them are fetishes of mine! And I somehow neglected to add "sex games," as well. Oh, the irony.
[info]ashbet wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:49 am (UTC)
A few minor spelling tweaks -- "Coprophagia" and "Gigolos" jump out at me right away.

And I'm "LMFAO" about "Urban Dictionary Bay" ;D

Love it -- and it's SO much easier to follow than the other map, although I understand that the other one was meant to illustrate overlaps and connections as well as just being a list of similar types of fetishes and sexual expression.

I'm enjoying the hell out of this! Haven't gone through everything because K's ready for bed, but I will tomorrow :D

-- A <3
[info]zotmeister wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 12:41 pm (UTC)
Seconded on Urban Dictionary Bay! - ZM
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:02 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ashbet - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:22 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ashbet - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:42 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]visudo wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:53 am (UTC)
Franklin, you're a sick man, and a brilliant man.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:02 pm (UTC)
Why, yes. Yes, I am. :) *snerk*
[info]figmentj wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:14 am (UTC)
Neat :)

My first known masturbation aid was a highlighter marker. I got off once with my mom's vibrator, and for some reason was then convinced that I had to have some kind of utensil. It didn't occur to me to use my fingers until I was 16.

I still kind of have a fondness for highlighters.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:03 pm (UTC)
Mmm, hilighters. That's pretty hot.
[info]joreth wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:55 am (UTC)
Love it!

I, too, had vague notions of printing it out. I think I'll try to come up with some creative uses for a large printout and when you think it's pretty nearly complete (I understand you might never think it's actually done), I just might do that.

The Gates map serves a different purpose, which is to illustrate the relation between various fetishes and such, but this one has just that endearing touch of whimsy that is your trademark. You add a sense of fun to the topic and the ability to connect to those who view the map, where the Gates map is far more clinical and disconnected - more like something I would have come up with.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:03 pm (UTC)
I really, really want to print out a wall-sized poster of this map and hang it up in my room. And I particularly like the push-pin idea above.
[info]nornagest wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 07:31 am (UTC)
I like. There's a bit of an XKCD aura to it; also, it includes some things that I'd never have thought of as fetishes (the Mile High Club, for example). Makes sense in retrospect, though, at least if you're using a non-clinical definition of fetishism.

What I'd really like to see, though, is some kind of systematic way to organize this spatially. Yours is an improvement on Gates' map, largely because you're organizing by psychological theme rather than object associations, but it's still kind of scattershot; I wonder if there'd be a way to assign these regions to a proper coordinate system (with X as neophilia and Y as externality, or something of the sort)?
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:09 pm (UTC)
I don't think that's possible to do on a 2D chart of any kind; tere are too many relationships and they're too complex. At some point, the groupings and relationships shown on any chart or map has to become arbitrary; old leather D/s is primarily gay men, Gorean D/s is almost exclusively heterosexual, but they have a lot of commonality of theme: rigid hierarchy, a strong caste system, emphasis on titles and rigidly defined roles. Would they be grouped together spacially (because of the similarities of activities) or apart from each other (because one is almost exclusively gay and one is almost exclusively het)? Would they be close to scene D/s (because of the commonality of power exchange) or far from it (because of the emphasis on power exchange as a part of someone's identity, rather than a temporary arrangement for the purpose of sexual gratification)?

Seems like the further you go into trying to create a coherent arrangement of fetishes, the more tangled it gets. By the time you've added a dozen or more things, either the map's unreadable or there are so many connections and lines you can't read it. If there's a way to solve that problem, I haven't been able to think of it yet.

A 3D map would help manage some of those problems, but it'd also be harder to create, and likely harder to read.
[info]wherever wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 09:51 am (UTC)
There's a bit of an XKCD aura to it

Yeah, that's what I was thinking, as well; it's reminiscent of the xkcd's layout of internet sites.
[info]nallix wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:42 pm (UTC)
This is exactly what I was thinking. For anyone reading this, especially Franklin, if you won't read xkcd, you NEED TO.
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]nallix - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:35 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 11:04 am (UTC)
Awesome, Franklin, great job!
Some thoughts:
- Shouldn't interracial be next to racial fetishes?
- I don't think gay sex should be a land on its own, that's just a different dimension. All the lands on the map can be traveled by people of different orientations.
- Where are the celebrity fantasies? That one is pretty popular.
- I haven't noticed resistance play anywhere on the map.
- Why is incest so far away, next to cannibalism? That's way more common fantasy.

And lastly, I'm afraid that your map doesn't really convey your point. Don't get me wrong, it's great... it's just that, the real answer to the people who are bored with sex because they've "done it all" is: depth over breadth. In the real geographical world also too many people go to organized trips that show them the major cities of Europe in 14 days, or something, and then they think they've seen it all. "Germany? Check! Been there, done that. Next!" But in reality they don't know 1/10 of the great things in their own town!

Same thing with sex. Many people will look at your map with satisfaction and say "Well, actually I really have done it all! (well, almost)", but the question is: how well?

Greta Christina's story "Bending" (http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2007/04/she_loved_an_ex.html) comes to mind:

And the accusation that "you only like to do one thing" completely baffled her. It wasn't one thing, she argued to herself on her way home from a particularly frustrating squabble. It wasn't one thing, any more than so-called regular sex was one thing. Being bent over was a whole field of things, an entire genus, with a zillion details that could vary. Wriggling and weeping versus serene submission; being gently guided to the edge of the bed versus being shoved onto the floor; jeans and cotton panties yanked down to her knees versus a flimsy skirt slowly pulled up to reveal her sluttily un-pantied bottom... these were distinct sex acts, obviously and self-evidently, as different as, say, intercourse and oral sex seemed to be for the rest of the world.


- Ola
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 11:38 am (UTC)
Also: where is the land of Tantric sex?

- Ola
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:35 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - (Anonymous) - Oct. 4th, 2008 12:44 am (UTC) Expand
[info]quicktongue wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 11:09 am (UTC)
Egads Man! I'm going to wear out the letters that spell "define:" on my keyboard. I've not heard of half of this stuff.

It is...illuminating...that I'd disagree on the placement of a couple of countries. But that'll be true of most people, and I'd imagine part of the point.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:28 pm (UTC)
I suspect so. Any map like this at some point is going to end up being arbitrary and subjective; I don't know if there's any way around that. (A rigorous taxonomy of human sexual behaviors sounds like it'd be a fun project, but also the kind of thing that one might sink years into.)
[info]greendreams wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 01:54 pm (UTC)
Amazing! I hope you'll be sharing this with lots and lots of folk. :)
[info]terriaminute wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 02:57 pm (UTC)
You're off tweaking this, aren't you? It will never end, the tweaking...

I find it hilarious that many of these comments are about misspellings. While good proofreading is priceless, it's hardly more important than what was missed, or seems misaligned, and the like. :-) There have been some useful comments made.

As 'anonymous' pointed out, it is merely words many of us have touched on but hardly explored thoroughly. I am only the mildest of kink, so I'll never get to many of the "countries" and am perfectly content about that. But, you know, it is mighty generous of you to share with us a way for us to show interested parties the amazing range of possibilities...
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:36 pm (UTC)
As a matter of fact, right when I was reading your reply, I was working on the map again, so yeah. :)
[info]datan0de wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 03:38 pm (UTC)
A couple of possible additions...
defloration

lumpkin

You have CFNM listed, but not it's counterpart, CMNF.

Also, did I miss "tattoos"? It's not listed in Body Modification.

You have "hairy" listed, but I wonder if that would be considered equivalent to "long hair"?

Somehow, "giving a panel discussion on cryptography at Dragon*Con" should be crammed in there, or maybe it's just me. ;-) Perhaps some permutation of "High I.Q."?

Oh, and I love that you included Legend of the Overfiend as it's own little demon city.
[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:26 pm (UTC)
Re: A couple of possible additions...
Hmm. These will have to go into the next rev...

Perhaps this release should have been called "0.1b1".
Re: A couple of possible additions... - [info]zotmeister - Oct. 8th, 2008 02:12 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]mama_hogswatch wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 04:37 pm (UTC)
I'm not gonna say I don't have some *ahem* slightly nonstandard tastes -- leastwise according to that map. I always considered myself mostly mundane. Apparently my view of mundane isn't the same as yours.

But I don't like linking the idea of not being into kinky sex as a fear-based thing. Surely there are people who don't like to be spanked because they don't tend to link pain sensations to sexual pleasure, right?

[info]tacit wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:25 pm (UTC)
I'm not suggesting that everyone who isn't into kink is afraid of it, certainly, though I do think that American society does have a strong hatred and fear of "deviant" sex1, and that there are many people who do seem quite concerned with remaining in a fairly small sexual space because they're worried about being perceived as "too weird." This is, I think, most especially true of sexual orientation, where there is often a great deal of fear of being perceived as "gay."

The "straits of fear" isn't a statement that everyone would be kinky if they weren't scared of it so much as a tongue-in-cheek poke of common social attitudes about sex.

1 And why don't we use the word "deviant" to describe nuns, anyway? Their sexual behavior unquestionably deviates from the norm...
(no subject) - [info]mama_hogswatch - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:28 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]tacit - Oct. 3rd, 2008 05:37 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]red_haut wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 06:08 pm (UTC)
people missing the point
those two folks who think they have/will have "done it all" have forgotten something...the connection with a lover. lots of people have a grand ol' time for 60 years doin' nothing more than a handful of positions. because it's not solely about the activity, it's about the emotion and the pleasure and the connection and the endorphins and all that other stuff. also i think some of us do a lot and then settle back into a groove of certain favorites and don't miss the other stuff.
[info]metawade wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2008 06:08 pm (UTC)

Love the geographical names!

Subsequent versions of the map could find material in the paraphilias. Looking over my self-diagnosed paraphilias, your maps covers aquaphilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, apodysophilia, aretifism, sitophilia, trichophilia, troilism, gynandromorphophilia and xenophilia, which I most identify with. But maybe an Isle of Paraphilias, with a nice little forest for the dendrophiliacs, and a (long) Peninsula of Pinocchio for the Nasophiliacs would be apropos. All sorts of amusing possibilities in paraphilia land!

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
( 123 comments — Leave a comment )