You are viewing tacit

Oct. 11th, 2008 (UTC)

This is a really good point. I hadn't thought of it that way.

I actually wanted to comment on the unwelcome porn issue in a different way. I think that the author tacit cites uses a broader definition of porn than most of us here. I think he's also referring to fake-breasted cover models in low-cut shirts on magazine covers. I think he's referring to people humping each other in music videos and singing about "my lovely lady lumps" on the radio. I think he's referring to advertisements that imply women will jump into bed with you if you wear a certain cologne. I don't consider these things "porn," but a lot of people do--or at least they consider them manifestations of a "porn culture." And unless you go join an Amish community or something, you really can't avoid that stuff. It's in the supermarket. It's on TV.

Comment Form

No HTML allowed in subject

  
 
   
 

Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting. 

(will be screened)

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner