That's not actually what I'm going to talk about. We met some folks, toured a submarine, and explored a cave system, but that's not what I'm going to talk about either.
Instead, what I'm going to talk about is sex. And brain research.
On the drive back, we were listening to a book on tape about neurology, which talked a bit about a company called Neurosky that was making brain research available to everyone. And it talked a good deal about neurofeedback, and learning to change one's brain states at will by using neurofeedback devices.
Now, Neurosky makes a full-fledged EEG machine on a chip. It's starting to show up in toys, like the Mattel Mind Flex, which teaches meditation by reading the user's brainwaves and letting the user control the toy with her mind.
Which, as I'm sure you can anticipate, got me to thinking about sex.
So the thing I've started pondering is the notion of a gadget a bit like the Mind Flex, only that runs a vibrator or some other sex toy. Which got me to wondering if sexual arousal, like meditation or concentration, is associated with a characteristic set of brainwave patterns.
So I am talking to someone in Seattle with a similar interest, and she might be able to get me access to a brain lab and an EEG. The first step would be to find out if sexual arousal can indeed be identified by a specific pattern of brainwaves. The next step would be to see if the Neurosky chip can be hacked to detect that pattern, and to run a sex toy like a vibrator. The third step would be to see, if all this works, whether or not it'd be feasible to actually build a self-contained, brain-operated sex toy system.
So for the first part, I am looking for volunteers willing to go to Seattle, get wired up to an EEG, and sexually aroused while their brainwaves are recorded. There are a few folks who I've talked to who are interested; any more takers?
- Current Mood:
bouncy
Comments
Sadly I am Philadelphian, otherwise I would leap gleefully at this opportunity.
~Duk
One alternative would be to use a galvanic skin response system. (You can get them for under $200 from places like http://www.wilddivine.com/ ) Galvanic skin response is a general measure of physiological arousal. It goes up (quickly) if you're angry, surprised, or sexually turned on. It goes down (slowly) if you're relaxed and/or meditating. I found the results to be smooth and consistent. You'd still be controlling the system with your mind, even if the result is measured through your fingers.
It occurred to me a while ago to build such an arousal biofeedback system (GSR -> synthetic audio generation -> OhMiBod) that would automatically experiment with different vibration settings to find one that maximized arousal, but I never got around to it. You should do it.
Cheapest place to find lightstones these days is via craiglist, actually. A lot of unhappy users selling theirs for < $50.
I did GSR -> Vibration down at a talk I did at Edges when it was around in south day. People were interested, but it's tough to keep their fingers in a place where they don't put pressure on them and screw with the readings while things are happening.
:)
At normal EEG level of details, there isn't a sex pattern as such. However you can map the arousal cycle as a sequence of distinct states, some of which are not normally found in other situations.
There are significant individual variations, including how much fantasizing is going on.
Nan Wise is one of the people running the study. It's part of her doctoral research. She speaks on polyamory from time to time, and does private counseling.
But yeah, you can see when someone's aroused with an fMRI. I wasn't, when I had one done, and in retrospect that could have been kind of awkward.
I do not know whether there are 'characteristic sets of brainwave patterns' -- but I know that, for me, sexual arousal is tied to a (difficult to reach) brain state.
I've been taking anti-depressants for over 13 years; they have made it extremely difficult for me to reach a state of sexual arousal. In my experience, the anti-depressants have made the transition to that brain state very difficult.
But... I am in Seattle, and I'm willing to be part of the test, if we can work out when and where to meet. You have access to my address and telephone number.
I've done work with both the neurosky and the emotiv. Both are far, far to noisy to be much fun, especially in a situation where you're going to have a ton of electrical noise from involuntary movements and contortions of the face.
In terms of using the neurosky for play, I created a Max/MSP external which was then hooked to a trancevibe. Unfortunately the updates of the major averages just aren't fast enough to be fun. However, you can extract some information about facial movements from the raw wave (which you get at 500hz), so you can do things like blink detection and what not.
Just don't get too excited about what you're going to get out of toys, since they are just that, toys. The connections are SUPER flakey on a good day, downright non-existent normally. Also, I'd highly recommend going with the neurosky SDK kit if you're serious about this, it's easier to deal with than screwing with the mindflex.
Personally I'd settle for a *guy* who could respond appropriately to these cues, but your experiment sounds like lots of fun.